How to facilitate online SysCon
Facilitating an Online systemic consensus is a valuable skill to help use the SysCon process.
If you simply want to participate in an online systemic consensus, please move to the parent page.
This article is mostly instructional - if you wish to learn more about the process conceptually you are recommended to read Systemic consensus and Decision making theory.
If you have any questions, please have a look at the FAQ. If you still have questions or require help please get in touch with @Janina Abels, @Joachim Thome or @Douglas Webb.
'Express needs, wants and values'
Currently the best solution is to start a riseup pad and include a introduction or prompt. You can use the template text below or a version of your own. As a facilitator, it's important to lead by example and include your own NWVs to make a good example.
'Form proposals' and 'Vote'
Currently the best solution is to start a 'konsensierung' on business.konsensieren.eu. It's worthwhile creating an account with your real name and picture to generate trust in participants. The additional advantage is not having to sign in to each new konsensierung with a temporary account and also to keep all the konsensierungen you are part of in one accessible location. Make sure to;
Include the link to the 'Express needs, wants and values' sheet in the question description
Set the 'Form proposals' phase with a minimum of 3 days (72 hours).
Set the 'Vote' phase to begin after 'Form proposals' ends.
Set the 'Vote' phase with a minimum of 3 days (72 hours).
Include 'Zero option' and 'Further solutions' options.
business.konsensieren.eu walk-through |
|---|
Notifying participants
Slack: Announce to relevant channel with a link to the NWV sheet. If for the whole organization, use #core-team
Trello: For an SysCon concerning the entire orgnization, there is also a Trello board which also notifies #core-team
Wiki calendar: Adding the phases on the calendar provides a nice visualization of active decisions. (optional)
Announcing outcomes
Announce outcomes on the channels where participants were notified
Seeking review
Last positive review on 2016/03/18 by @Joachim Thome