2016-09-20 - The general concept of organising

Under construction!

The Meeting that happened on the 20th of September was called upon by yunity-member Z, for the reason of unhappiness with the current state of structure of yunity-decision-making and especially the loose responsability-management that would in her/his opinion possibly lead to dangerous activities and even eventually to the drifting apart of the whole group, after experiencing difficulties regarding that the previous days and even months, resulting in a call for interim-guidelines to steer the group away from hazard, as far as I, Birke, understood her/his propositions. 
I was given the responsability to moderate this meeting resulting in a somewhat large group i.e. ~10 individuals stating their general understanding of organisation, how it is done so far and how one wishes it would be done by their standards. As I am certain, that Doug is working on a version of how it has been done generally with examples of the systems that used that certain version of organisation this article will focus on the way it should generally be done by the standards of the author, hopefully developing by future edits to include the standards of more interested individuals possibly even the whole groups. During the end of the meeting it was proposed to think of decision-making and organisationstructuring experiments, that could be tested on future WuppDays to progress towards a working organisational structure for decision-making for all of yunity to be approved. The meeting ended with a paradoxical dilemma introduced by Doug about decision-making which was: How can we decide on a standard decision-making system without a standard decision-making system?

General ideal concept of organisational structure for decision-making 

By organising and exploring its general concept this article will try to adress how a organisation of individuals can live in the same environment with each other and be cooperative rather than in each others way. 

General composition of organising following the concept of Dragon Dreaming:

1.Definition: At the first stage in an attempt to get something done in a organized fashion a plan/vision is formed by a single member or multiple members and then layed out as detailed as possible and necessary towards everyone involved by a mean deemed fit and accessible. Usually this would adress the needs of a any number of members or the whole group. 

Means to publify the Definition of the to be organized item: 

• • declare your plan/vision orally to every participating member
  • write down the plan/vision, post it somewhere for everybody to be seen and notify them of the location
  • connect each other via technology and create a common plan/vision-page for everybody involved to work with

2.Agreement/Compromise: In the next step the existing plans/visions of every participant need to be accumulated to a common plan/vision to be enforced as a single entity. If a certain situation would benefit greatly from not acting as single entity and the participants can agree on splitting up, trying to solve the goal each on their own, that option should be considered available as well. That should not be the case, if the participants are failing to agree on a common plan.

3.Responseabilitymanagment/Powerhierarchy: Once a common plan/vision has successfully been adopted the next stage is the struggle to realise the plan as closely as seems achievable.

4.Celebration