Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

whyyTJV02J.ogg

  • 01:34, Janina
  • try Try to pinpoint the main questions touched by asking wh-y-unity:
  •     why     Why are we participating in yunity?
  •     what     What are we hoping to achieve by being with yunity?
  •     what     What does yunity signify for us?
  •     what     What is the scope of the name 'yunity'?
  • Selina's quote on radicality in #barcelona
  • "I'd rather make the world a bit better but be successful, than try to change it completely and fail."


whyyTJV03T.ogg

  • 03:12, Tilmann
  • Big discussion about words, words stay vague and unclear, let's talk about actions instead.
  • "If you don't do the things you're talking about you can never be sure of what you actually mean."
  • Different aspects of yunity: project, network, community. what are these to us? We don't mention them explicitly, that leads to loads of confusion.


whyyTJV04J.ogg

  • 04:04, Janina
  • Definitions of words are hard, words are always ambiguous.
  • Dougs efforts of defining terms a year ago
  • What is yunity about? Only sharing? But then all the time?
  • Joachim's comic
  • The proposed syscon on acquiring resources holds many difficulties:
  • Who is part of yunity? For whom would such a decision be binding? How to enforce it?
  • "In my perception of yunity there's no way to go through with something like this, because there shouldn't be an authority defining who/what is yunity"
  • Chandi's statement comparing yunity to transition town in #barcelona.
  • "Don't we wanna be a movement and connect to looots and lots of people? [...] The more people you have in your movement, the more likely it is that somebody does something you don't agree with."


whyyTJV05T.ogg

  • 05:29, Tilmann
  • Different concepts of yunity
  • yunity can do things. we know that people do things, but other people perceive actions as actions by yunity.
  • What is a yunity action? What is an individual action? Should we even distinguish like this?
  • "I think people can never fully exist inside yunity, if they will always be able to still do non-yunity actions."
  • Then yunity wouldn't be a group of people (project/network/community) but an abstract level of behavior.
  • "We can define yunity as a state, as something we can reach."
  • The vision is a state, the mission the way to reach the state.
  • "I would consider myself part of yunity but I can't even cite the vision and mission. And I guess there are others like me."
  • "Should we swear an oath to our V&M so that we always remember it and always act accordingly? (wink)"
  • Or should we come up with (a) new V&M(s) to better reflect what people are actually working on in a more concrete way?


whyyTJV06J.ogg

  • 02:46, Janina
  • Vagueness of V&M is not a bad thing as it allows for multiple interpretations.
  • The greatest things about yunity are its openness, acceptance and trust.
  • Trust should also imply a trust that people are good, even if they're not 100% in line with V&M or each other.
  • "It would be a shame to lose so many people who already are part of yunity or would like to be, just because they use money once in a while."