Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Introduction

Systemic consensus is a decision making process developed by Erich Visotschnig and Siegfried Schrotta - two ex-IBM system analysts from Austria - in 2001.[website] A key feature is the use of scalar, resistance voting: in contrast to the competition-promoting plurality vote where people can be dragged into outcomes they didn't want, the resistance vote promotes collaboration by selecting the outcome most people can live with.[details] Systemic consensus can occur online and offline, in short and full formats - all of which contain the same fundamental stages described below.

NB: This form of decision making is probably not what you're used to and requires practice and reprogramming of old habits.

 


 

Overview

The systemic consensus process takes a question as an input and gives a decision as an output. The framework for this process is composed of the following stages;

  1. The question
  2. The systemic consensus cycle
    1. Express needs, wants and values
    2. Form proposals
    3. Vote
  3. The decision

  • No labels