...
We tried to cluster the values and thought of the methods used before, which were semantic clustering and creating a range from basic to sophisticated. This time nothing seemed to fit. (Maybe this was also due to exhaustion because of the long and lengthy process, but who can ever know for sure...) Whatever the reason, we started presenting the values one person at a time, which held the benefit of the individuals being able to point out the personally perceived interdependencies of the values mentioned. (Sadly I didn't take notes on this and write this page multiple days after it happened, so I forgot quite a lot... maybe even some values themselves, pardon.)
Matthias started presenting his values: (tbw)purposeful use of time, friendlyness, mindfulness, safety, sustainability, helpfulness
Janina was next: (tbw)authenticity, independent thinking, flexibility, consequence in thought and action, loyalty, mindfulness, openness
Then Paul: (tbw)freedom, self-determination, collaboration, openness/honesty, mindfulness
And last Bodhi: (tbw)mindfulness, sustainability, authenticity,
We then went through the presented values and looked at them with a different question again: "Could this also be a group value for us?"
First we eliminated some values, we could easily get rid of. When that got increasingly hard we switched the direction and directly decided on values to accept as group values, always accompanied by clarifiying talks and discussions, since one-noun-concepts normally offer a wide range of possible interpretations. The outcome of this process can be found on our proposal for group values.