(english version below)
present/
Anwesende: Q, Rosina, Bodhi, Laurina, Adrean, Lara, Matthias, Anna, Lisa, (Paul 13:19-)
Start: 12:38
- Sammeln, was offen ist, worüber jeder reden will
...
5. Was bei scheitern?
Das Geld geht nicht an die Einzelpersonen zurück.
Der Verein kann die laufenden Kosten nicht mehr decken. Vereinsmitglieder zerstreiten sich.
Wem geben wir das Vereinsvermögen, wenn sich der Verein auflöst? Paul, dem HWR
6. Vereinsgründung
Förderung einer Kultur des Teilens.
Präambel: ?
7. Social Architecture:
Entscheidungsfindung
Wir entscheiden nicht mit der Mitgliederversammlung sondern gemäß der Geschäftsordnung
English version:
present: Q, Rosina, Bodhi, Laurina, Adrean, Lara, Matthias, Anna, Lisa, (Paul 13:19-)
Start: 12:38
1. Begin: gathering topics, what is open, what everyone wants to talk about
2. Finances
How do we stand to the topic of buying?
Q: generally is okay with using money, if for the rights purpose (here: the real estate market gets more expensive, "saving" the house for more meaningsful projects) the city is supporting us
Adrean: money is a sensible topic in yunity, it is the reason rafael left
Lara: thinks it is good as long as money is there to use it in order to create open houses (inorder totake houses form the real estate market). If hwr buys it also interesting
Matthias: we get houses in order to make them open, same opinion as q and lara
Laurina: same opinion as q,matthias and lara but also adrean. Idea of living free of money (especially in the long term social impact) is very interesting and should be actively brought into the wuppHaus. Advantage is the house is bought beause there are no restrictions form the proprietor
Anna: finds other points more relevant but also iportant to engage with this topic
Lisa: connects value with the money (still) and would give value to the house if she puts in money thats why she finds it difficult to contribute financially. No resistance for buying a house. Sees a self purpose in buying but sees it justified because the projectaim is behind it. The process of using money should be transparent
Rosina: the action should be authencial. Buying a house had an impact on the topic of money (payment, experts,...) Because of that we have to have good reasons for using money. Why money here and not for many other things?Big interest for making a roject as moneyfree as possible.
Bodhi: consequences in starting to pay people. fear that there will be many discussions for the usage of money. Property tax, paying Michael, if we also pay other experts? Happy to have found a good usage for his money.
Paul: through the usage of money you rate down other people who are not in the position to use money
We accept the usage of money in order to buy a house, because it will become an open space through this. This is under the precondition thet the usage of money regarding the buying of the house is clearly defined in order not to loose our authenticity.
...