The decision-making work of Joachim Thome, Bodhi Neiser and Douglas Webb and others was presented to the rest of the WuppDays #4 core team. Joachim gave an intro into decision making theory and Doug facilitated a Full Systemic Consensus full systemic consensus round on the question 'Which film should we watch next?'. It is worth mentioning that this question would be unlikely to make it into a Full SysCon full systemic consensus round normally, but it was decided to be better to use a trivial question that we would honour honor the decision for instead of asking a serious question where the decision could not be honoured. Below are the results from the cycle:honored (as not all relevant parties present).
Date: 2016-01-16
Location: Chemnitz
Participants: Douglas Webb, Camille Childeric, Nick Sellen, Matthias Larisch, Martin Schott, Adrean König, Konrad Becker, M. Kühn, Bodhi Neiser, Tais Real, gabriela and Anja Konhäuser
Facilitators: Douglas Webb, Bodhi Neiser and Joachim Thome
Needs, Wants & Values
| Info |
|---|
DW: I need to watch a film that is downloaded! No buffering. I want to watch a film that makes me laugh at least once. I value good cinema and wide group acceptance. CC : Needs: need to finish the movie before 00:30 cqus eim leqving afterwards . Want: A comedy or documentary related to yunity values . Values: Community, sharing... Nick Sellen:
Matthias Larisch:
Martin Schott:
Adrian
Konrad:
Melinda K:
Bodhi Neiser: I want a film with a sad ending and that everyone will enjoy watching. Taïs
Gaby
Anja
|
Proposals
| Info |
|---|
| Round 1 0 = Spontaneous and unstructured decision
FS = Further Solutions |
Vote
| Vote | Proposal | BN | CC | MS | GV | NS | TR | MK | KB | DW | Me | ML | AK | Total | % max. resistance | Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 17% | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 28 | 23% | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 30 | 25% | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 36 | 30% | 3 | |
| 18 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 39 | 33% | 2 | |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 39 | 33% | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 40 | 33% | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 33% | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 40 | 33% | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 43 | 36% | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 44 | 37% | 2.5 | |
| 10 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 44 | 37% | 2.5 | |
| 5 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 50 | 42% | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 50 | 42% | 3 | |
| 11 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 51 | 43% | 3.5 | |
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 52 | 43% | 3.5 | |
| 13 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 53 | 44% | 4 | |
| 17 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 53 | 44% | 5 | |
| 12 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 59 | 49% | 5 | |
| FS | 5 | 5 | 9 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 71 | 59% | 5.5 | |
| 6 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 80 | 67% | 7.5 | |
| 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 86 | 72% | 8 |
...
Outcome
In answer to the question:
Which film should we watch next?
12 participants selected the following proposal with 17 % max. resistance:
How to change the world