Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Under construction!


The Meeting that happened on the 20th of September was called upon by Zed, for the reason of unhappiness with the current state of structure of yunity-decision-making and especially the loose responsability-management that would in his opinion possibly lead to dangerous activities and even eventually to the drifting apart of the whole group, after experiencing difficulties regarding that the previous days and even months, resulting in a call for interim-guidelines to steer the group away from hazard, as far as I, Birke, understood his propositions. 
I was given the responsability to moderate this meeting resulting in a somewhat large group i.e. ~10 individuals stating their general understanding of organisation, how it is done so far and how one wishes it would be done by their standards. As I am certain, that Doug is working on a version of how it has been done generally with examples of the systems that used that certain version of organisation this article will focus on the way it should generally be done by the standards of the author, hopefully developing by future edits to include the standards of more interested individuals possibly even the whole groups. During the end of the meeting it was proposed to think of decision-making and organisationstrucuring experiments, that could be tested on future WuppDays to progress towards a working organisational structure for decision-making for all of yunity to be approved. The meeting ended with a paradoxical dilemma introduced by Doug about decision-making which was: How can we decide on a standard decion-making system without a standard decision-making system?

...