After the success of the last open WuppDays, discussions about having at open WuppDays at Nürnberg came up several times. At the evening round of 2016-0205 02-04 Douglas Webb proposed to have a systemic consensus on the matter with Joachim Thome seconding the proposal and helping to formulate the question. The systemic consensus was held the following day starting at 11:30 .
Participants
Axel Kalitzki, Kirstin Siu, Philip Engelbutzeder, Douglas Webb, Joachim Thome, Tais Real and Janina Abels
Facilitators
Joachim Thome and Douglas Webb
Needs, Wants and Values
| Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
AK: I need some more informations about the abilitys the wupphouse sould definitly have KS: I would like open WuppDays, if they occur to be well organized and have a way to bring those who are interested into the teams in a good way. I would like to have a better process for introducing new team members before having another open WuppDays. I value having a well set up, open and engaging way to welcome new people. DW: I need to remained focused on my other tasks. I want to inspire others with the yunity story! I value connection and joy. PE: Keep it as a regular thing. Same values as the WuppDays = everybody is invited, nobody has to pay for anything JT: focused, because we want to, fun TR: need- stressfree event! want- an event where people feel welcomed and included as they walk in values- nobody should be expected to pay for anything or feel that they should JA: I need for the OpenWuppDays to feel right, a space that’s free of entryfees, altough having the opportunity (not the nessecity) to buy drinks would be fine to me. I want the location to be big enough to hold at least 20-30 people. I’d like it to be cozy, but that’s not mandatory. I value people having time to talk to each other, as well as listening to prepared talks. |
...
| Vote | Proposal | DW | JA | AK | TR | KS | PE | JT | Total | % total resistance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 31.42857143 | |
| 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 24.28571429 | ||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 10 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 18.57142857 | ||
| 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14.28571429 | ||
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 22.85714286 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 20 | 28.57142857 | ||
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 10 | ||
| 8 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 19 | 27.14285714 | ||
| FS | 0 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 32 | 45.71428571 | ||
| Runoff vote | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11.42857143 | |
| 7 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 21.42857143 |
Outcome
...
If we can confirm a venue in the next 48 hours that can host 30 people minimum, we host the open WuppDays. The event would be primarily awareness raising, not contributor recruiting.
Metadata
The whole process took roughly 24 minutes (11:30 - 11:54)
4 minutes and 15 seconds of this time were used to explain the process, thus net times for the process was just under 20 minutes.
We had some tiny hiccups on the runoff vote because two people read the voting matrix not as intended by the respective authors. This was found out and corrected. Additionally, there was some confusion as to whether the resistance scale was 0-2 or 0-10.
With near to 10 % resistance, the chosen proposal is considered to be a very good compromise (good with under 30 percent).