Versions Compared
Key
- This line was added.
- This line was removed.
- Formatting was changed.
...
- JT: For reevaluation questions can be asked to resistant person asked why someone is highly resistant,
| Excerpt |
|---|
DW: Possibility of using the wiki for systemic consensus. Pro: Platform in use, people have accounts, keeps all sections of systemic consensus in one place, instantly documented, can. Con: Not designed for systemic consensus, people have to be responsible and disciplined to do the stages in the correct order, voting cannot be done synchronously (votes infuenced by others), people can't 'break' other peoples entries. JT: konsensieren.eu is the better technical solution right now, although I want to test different approaches. With konsensieren.eu we can analyze resistance to find out THAT there is high resistance in a good solution and then ask for who and why. Find a better technical solution in long run, either with the konsensieren.eu team or with our own software. |
[Meeting ends: 13:30]
...
Outcomes
...